Ir al contenido principal

Language as the “Ultimate Weapon” in Nineteen Eighty-Four

The key factor that separates us from animals, we are symbolic animals, every entity of this space has its name by our own perception, we understand our surrounding by our own collective interpretation and definition from that same interpretation. Everything has a defined name that encapsulates the whole idea, limiting that entity presence in the created context. Language has given us the ability to express and communicate to other human beings, the ambiguous interpretations of the universe from the first civilizations were the main structure for the evolution of our cosmovision, with that language has been the syntax of our perception. The definition of objects and things we manage to comprehend, has a limitation, the same name and definition of that specific object limits its space, leaving that object being unnoticed and with less importance. If we remove language, how the interpretations of our existence and the universe could be? If we thing about language, we can see that is a mere abstraction, it has only meaning for a human being of course depending on the context, because with a great variety of languages comes different interpretations. Take this blog entry for example, it is written on English, the idea that is displayed by this words is limited by the English language, on other languages this entry could have a different interpretation and explanation, it could be more accurate or not. The expansion of the languages is possible, but its own definition limits the mind, for uncertainty, language is a limitation.

George Orwell teaches us about the power of language, it could determine a certain context, blinding everyone from reality, but what is reality, we create reality by our own collective agreement, of course it is defined by a language, many realities exist, always pointing to a given context.

Concerning to programming languages course, there is an important observation that relates to Orwell's New Speech, talking about environment makes sense in a society context and in a computer system context, language defines the environment, defines the structures, the procedure to resolve a conflict, to manage ideas. If the language has the structure to name everything in our surrounding like the Linnaean taxonomy, the language's scope is vast. Clojure presented a new style and form in programming, which encourage me to think about compilers, the whole schema behind a compiler, the symbol table, the lexical analyzer, the parser, etc; is the box that limits the language. The creation of languages alter the scope of solutions.

http://34.212.143.74/s201911/tc2006/language_ultimate_weapon.html

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

The Semicolon Wars

This article, The Semicolon Wars, is quite the argument by telling, why are there many language programs and they differ in syntax and other contexts, well, the author gets most of every explanation out of this. One of the topics mentioned in the article was the way of looking / analysing an entire problem or even, looking at the way of things, abstraction, If you see an object with my eyes, would you see it differently? Some programming languages are meant for some problems, depends on how you see the way of it. It comes to my mind the language... . not programming language, I mean German, the structure of the German language is quite describefull , for instance, take the word Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung , looks a little bit scary, right? but if we look at it divided into the ideas that creates the meaning of this word we could understand why German is very precise. This in English is Land transaction approval transferring resp...

The Secret History of Women in Coding

Programming existed more that it could be ever imaged, that historical procedure, the combination of metal such as hardware and digits such as software, merged into one environment, at first that segmentation between hardware and software was notorious, by women being more likely to be programmers than men, but now a days this premise changes almost completely. There is often that question that pops out, why the differentiation, speaking of the treatment women had to endure through the whole human existence. The article titled The Secret History of Women in Coding mentions that out, there still exists sexism and discrimination, in this case in the environment of computer science. It had been very difficult to acknowledge the brilliant female minds that made extraordinary creations and gave birth to a whole new world of possibilities. Programming is label free, “the computer doesn’t even care if the programmer is female or black...” what ever race or ideology the programmer has. As a ...

All I Really Need to Know about Pair Programming I Learned In Kindergarten

Pair programming has such potential that encourages to make two programmers work together in a simple task, roles are defined in this matter, one controlling the computer while the other is the observer, each one has to establish a communication in order to solve the presented problem. “Two minds think better than one”, and it is proven that pair programming gives better software results and is a technique that if it is used by the rules of kindergarten , w h ere the important thing is how every programmer is involved in the problem solution and the communication they have one and another. This simple task that is getting two people to work together in order to accomplish a certain task, i t s amazing, take for example music, two artists jamming together to perform a greater song, the role they are playing may differ from pair programming, but each musician has their own role in the performance. Some experiences in life presented in different environments could become a perfect metaph...