Ir al contenido principal

Language as the “Ultimate Weapon” in Nineteen Eighty-Four

The key factor that separates us from animals, we are symbolic animals, every entity of this space has its name by our own perception, we understand our surrounding by our own collective interpretation and definition from that same interpretation. Everything has a defined name that encapsulates the whole idea, limiting that entity presence in the created context. Language has given us the ability to express and communicate to other human beings, the ambiguous interpretations of the universe from the first civilizations were the main structure for the evolution of our cosmovision, with that language has been the syntax of our perception. The definition of objects and things we manage to comprehend, has a limitation, the same name and definition of that specific object limits its space, leaving that object being unnoticed and with less importance. If we remove language, how the interpretations of our existence and the universe could be? If we thing about language, we can see that is a mere abstraction, it has only meaning for a human being of course depending on the context, because with a great variety of languages comes different interpretations. Take this blog entry for example, it is written on English, the idea that is displayed by this words is limited by the English language, on other languages this entry could have a different interpretation and explanation, it could be more accurate or not. The expansion of the languages is possible, but its own definition limits the mind, for uncertainty, language is a limitation.

George Orwell teaches us about the power of language, it could determine a certain context, blinding everyone from reality, but what is reality, we create reality by our own collective agreement, of course it is defined by a language, many realities exist, always pointing to a given context.

Concerning to programming languages course, there is an important observation that relates to Orwell's New Speech, talking about environment makes sense in a society context and in a computer system context, language defines the environment, defines the structures, the procedure to resolve a conflict, to manage ideas. If the language has the structure to name everything in our surrounding like the Linnaean taxonomy, the language's scope is vast. Clojure presented a new style and form in programming, which encourage me to think about compilers, the whole schema behind a compiler, the symbol table, the lexical analyzer, the parser, etc; is the box that limits the language. The creation of languages alter the scope of solutions.

http://34.212.143.74/s201911/tc2006/language_ultimate_weapon.html

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

All I Really Need to Know about Pair Programming I Learned In Kindergarten

Pair programming has such potential that encourages to make two programmers work together in a simple task, roles are defined in this matter, one controlling the computer while the other is the observer, each one has to establish a communication in order to solve the presented problem. “Two minds think better than one”, and it is proven that pair programming gives better software results and is a technique that if it is used by the rules of kindergarten , w h ere the important thing is how every programmer is involved in the problem solution and the communication they have one and another. This simple task that is getting two people to work together in order to accomplish a certain task, i t s amazing, take for example music, two artists jamming together to perform a greater song, the role they are playing may differ from pair programming, but each musician has their own role in the performance. Some experiences in life presented in different environments could become a perfect metaph...

Dick Gabriel on Lisp

It is quite interesting how the path one take may be altered in a certain way of creation, it is not know that is going to happen in the future, or even what things we would do. Some key events on life brings us where we are right know, you could be a programmer but maybe in some future you will work with plants. Technology is present in all branches, in everything where ingenious and creation is. Working with other branch that is new to your context may improve some things around you, the fact of having more tools at your range may give some performance in what you are doing, in the case of Dick Gabriel, he talks on how technology had helped him. And the way LISP works is understandable if we look at the abstraction of its commitment. With LISP’s creation, programmers had improved in certain areas of computer science, such as AI. With this creation had come an important revolution that had change certain paradigms that programmers lived in. Languages… like LISP has the struc...

The Semicolon Wars

This article, The Semicolon Wars, is quite the argument by telling, why are there many language programs and they differ in syntax and other contexts, well, the author gets most of every explanation out of this. One of the topics mentioned in the article was the way of looking / analysing an entire problem or even, looking at the way of things, abstraction, If you see an object with my eyes, would you see it differently? Some programming languages are meant for some problems, depends on how you see the way of it. It comes to my mind the language... . not programming language, I mean German, the structure of the German language is quite describefull , for instance, take the word Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung , looks a little bit scary, right? but if we look at it divided into the ideas that creates the meaning of this word we could understand why German is very precise. This in English is Land transaction approval transferring resp...