Ir al contenido principal

The Semicolon Wars

This article, The Semicolon Wars, is quite the argument by telling, why are there many language programs and they differ in syntax and other contexts, well, the author gets most of every explanation out of this. One of the topics mentioned in the article was the way of looking / analysing an entire problem or even, looking at the way of things, abstraction, If you see an object with my eyes, would you see it differently?

Some programming languages are meant for some problems, depends on how you see the way of it. It comes to my mind the language.... not programming language, I mean German, the structure of the German language is quite describefull, for instance, take the word Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung, looks a little bit scary, right? but if we look at it divided into the ideas that creates the meaning of this word we could understand why German is very precise. This in English is Land transaction approval transferring responsibilities Regulation, is the separation of ideas that conforms the meaning of the whole idea. Take the first words: Grundstücksverkehr, this means Land Transport, now break this word again apart and grab Grundstück, which, depending on the context, it means Land, or Property, but the combination of this well defined word creates a whole new concept. Getting this example of the German language, it is viable to say that programming languages may differ, because of the abstraction, and how a problem is solved.

What is the perfect programming language? Well in my opinion it does not exists, we only need to create certain things to solve other things, and always will depend on who creates that, thats why we have misunderstandings or sometimes we don’t get the information right. Language defines our knowledge, defines our way of thinking, actually defines everything.

http://34.212.143.74/s201911/tc2006/semicolon_wars.pdf

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

The Roots of Lisp

T hinking about a perfect structure for a perfect environment, each symbol representing many possibilities, each key has it’s own purpose and behavior in that context. The only limitations is the scope of the created structures. Lisp had defined a style in programming, with new possibilities for problem solving that takes the programmer out of the box, and brings a new point of view. But finally it is only an interpretation, a translation between human and machine, we may give sense to our perception by the usage of language and writing, this perception can be very complex or very simple, it can always depend on the observer and the given context… for example hardware, only understands voltage, the abstraction of a programming language goes into the process of becoming machine language, which are kind of voltage instructions for the millions of transistors inside a CPU, programming language has been limited by this context, the limitations are hardware dependent. New approaches with...

The Secret History of Women in Coding

Programming existed more that it could be ever imaged, that historical procedure, the combination of metal such as hardware and digits such as software, merged into one environment, at first that segmentation between hardware and software was notorious, by women being more likely to be programmers than men, but now a days this premise changes almost completely. There is often that question that pops out, why the differentiation, speaking of the treatment women had to endure through the whole human existence. The article titled The Secret History of Women in Coding mentions that out, there still exists sexism and discrimination, in this case in the environment of computer science. It had been very difficult to acknowledge the brilliant female minds that made extraordinary creations and gave birth to a whole new world of possibilities. Programming is label free, “the computer doesn’t even care if the programmer is female or black...” what ever race or ideology the programmer has. As a ...

Language as the “Ultimate Weapon” in Nineteen Eighty-Four

T he key factor that separates us from animals, we are symbolic animals, every entity of this space has its name by our own perception, we understand our surrounding by our own collective interpretation and definition from that same interpretation. Everything has a defined name that encapsulates the whole idea, limiting that entity presence in the created context. Language has given us the ability to express and communicate to other human beings, the ambiguous interpretations of the universe from the first civilizations were the main structure for the evolution of our cosmovisio n, with that language has been the syntax of our perception. The definition of objects and things we manage to comprehend, has a limitation, the same name and definition of that specific object limits its space, leaving that object being unnoticed and with less importance. If we remove language, how the interpretations of our existence and the universe could be? If we thing about languag e, we can see that is ...